CPVLab Discount: Save $50!
  #1  
Old 11-16-2008, 12:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default CJ, SAS, Linkshare

Anyone using CJ/SAS/Linkshare to promote Pay Per Sale type offers?

From my understanding, they use cookie based rather than pixel firing so it makes it like cookie stuffing.

I noticed that some advertisers say it explicitly in their descriptions. If we're just sending a few views a day (like if I bid on order pages URLs), would they even notice?

I heard that Van Clute got dinged at CJ, but i'm not sure what the real story is.

Any thoughts?????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2008, 03:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think all of these networks have listed that they don't accept PPV traffic in their terms.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2008, 02:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Really? I haven't been able to spot it...

where do I look for the terms?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2008, 04:10 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You can probably search for "adware" in their terms and find some info.

I found this info on SAS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShareAS...mbating_Adware
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2008, 08:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I don't get this either. In a few of the "Success Stories" section and other places on this forum people are talking about using PPV for promoting Pay Per Sale offers, or percentage of sale offers.

Are you guys just ignoring TOS? Cookie stuffing definitely works, that's why a bunch of affiliates over on ebay just got dropped and sued.

Or am I confused about Pay Per Sale?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2008, 08:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Whoa good find..

Originally Posted by thenoto View Post
You can probably search for "adware" in their terms and find some info.

I found this info on SAS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShareAS...mbating_Adware
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2008, 05:22 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Some networks hate this traffic, others don't mind it. That's why you must make sure it's allowed first. Van Clute did big numbers because he was sending illegal traffic to offers that didn't accept it. He didn't get paid for it either, (not sure if he ever mentioned that part).

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2008, 05:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Van Clute is a fuckwit. who would turn off their profitable ppc campaigns and only do ppv. I think his brains weren't quite working.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2008, 01:15 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

do you know what network / how much he did...i am doing stuff some networks and now im a little worried...its been going about 5 months (about $100 / day) so far and they keep paying me out, but im worried about being sued...gonna stop my campaigns i think =P.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2008, 03:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Bump...looking for some insight on my last reply...anyone?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0